当前位置：《双城记》读后感
读完某一作品后，大家对人生或者事物一定产生了许多感想，是时候抽出时间写写读后感了。那么我们该怎么去写读后感呢？以下是小编为大家整理的《双城记》读后感，希望能够帮助到大家。
《双城记》读后感1
在读《双城记》之前，看过网上某一些介绍，说《双城记》虽是一本经典的小说，但因为其明确指出这段背景是法国大革命，于是对革命的表现就被认为是作者的写作观。而这正是对小说无数争议的焦点。狄更斯在小说中除了以细腻的笔墨展示了贵族的残忍，同样也展示了革命群众非理性的破坏。作者认为，革命是一种压迫取代了另一种压迫，一场直接浓重的血腥*替代了另外一场血腥。对攻占巴士底狱以及对*民众的一系列描写——血腥，残忍，狡诈，恶毒是小说最为引人注目的地方。
我觉得作者为了表达自己感情思想，就刻画了当时法国革命群众的.邪恶之处，体现他并不喜欢革命，甚至对革命的痛恨。他不了解革命所含有的意义，但是作者推崇主张让爱来改变世界——这种爱，体现在小说中的包括亲情，爱情，友情这种私人间的感情，也包括抛弃贵族，拯救苍生的那种博爱。
读了书后，个人喜欢卡顿，卡顿在小说被描述：“太阳悲悲切切，切切悲悲的冉冉升起，它所照见的景物，没有比这个人更惨的了。他富有才华，情感高尚，却没有施展才华流露情感的机会，不能有所作为，也无力谋取自己的幸福。他深知自己的症结所在，却听天由命，任凭自己年复一年的虚度光阴，消耗殆尽。”
卡顿这是个自甘堕落湮没了自己的才华和青春的年轻人。而卡顿的堕落，源于自己对日渐堕落的社会的失望。他走上断头台前曾说过，“我看到这个时代的邪恶，和造成这一恶果的前一时代的邪恶，逐渐为自己赎了罪而消亡。”
卡顿是悲哀的，也许他不应该被埋没，是为世所迫，没有人去帮助他，人们关注革命，加大压迫。
《双城记》读后感2
He left his property to the French people, but his heart did not get good result, and then after the bastille was captured in 1778, he was a loyal servant letter pleading, back to the stranger began his rescue work in France, however, when he first set foot on French territory was put into the fox prison, to escape the nobleman's charges charges will be on doctor ma, Lucy have also come to France to save him, Luo Duan in France, just use the horse nate crouched bastille influence to reach him, however, fate always makes good people he was released on the day of the evening was caught again, is this a horse nate used by the manuscript was in prison, his son-in-law on the guillotine, at this time has been protected in a card played a great lawyer his function, finally with his own life, Lucy is in a happy, at Lucy's mind set up the image of a tall forever, it is great to love and be loved.
Caton is an intelligent, very clever, insight very strong professional lawyers, if in today, he must have called the law of celebrities, but at the time the hero useless, therefore, he can only use wine to pour out all the troubles, as well as the fate brought him great the eyes of others he is always idle, depraved, of course except Lucy.
Besides, there were miss pross, Lucy's faithful servant and friend, and the bad character, which brought hope to the people.
The French people I have been so inclined to lament are not so perfect as I thought they were, and in this book they show more of the evil nature of their revolution.
《双城记》读后感3
《双城记》，昨天深夜读完这部小说，当翻完最后一页时，毫不犹豫关闭了手机，一个人，一盏灯，恰巧窗外一只蛐蛐叫，夜很静，但内心却汹涌澎湃，是感动，也有温暖，这是开始这部小说时没意料到的收获。
小说以法国革命为背景，用朴实的笔触描写了革命时期一幕幕触目惊心的画面，让人真切的感受到了革命的残忍、罪恶、暴动、无情及苦难。让人沉重的同时，又绕着马奈特一家及周围朋友之间发生的故事，诠释了爱的主题，让人不禁感叹:唯有爱，才能让伤口愈合；唯有爱，才能让人走向正道；唯有爱，才能让人幸福；唯有爱，才能让人勇为无惧；也唯有爱，我们才能生生不息！
回忆一下小说中写到的人物:1.不愿为埃弗瑞蒙德兄弟隐瞒丑事后被秘密囚禁18年的马奈特医生；2.心地善良、勤俭持家、总能给身边人带去温暖的露西；3.不想同流合污，自愿放弃贵族及财产，而去当一名法语教师，靠自己的劳动养活自己的达内；4.台尔森银行老员工，工作认真、生活一丝不苟的洛瑞；5.嗜酒成性、慵懒颓废、放荡不羁又才华横溢的卡顿；6.直步青云、实而不华的庸俗律师斯特里弗；7.拥有疯狂的爱国热情却没有人性的德发日夫妇等等。让我印象深刻并且喜欢的是卡顿，虽然他总给人一副萎靡不振、玩世不恭的样子，其实内藏着一颗纯洁美好的心，他对露西的爱，那应该才算是一个男人对一个女人最真的爱！那份爱早已超乎肤浅的男女之爱，而是一种对善良与高尚的追求！特别是小说的最后，卡顿为了露西完整的幸福而决定去替换达内并为之付出生命时，闪耀着的'不只有爱的光芒，还有人格的魅力！情不自禁再次念起:复活在我，生命在我，信我的人，虽然死了，也必复活，凡活着信我的人，必永远不死！
《双城记》，前部分感觉有点晦涩难懂，但后部分却给人很大的敲击，不负此阅哪！
“那是最美好的时代，那是最糟糕的时代；那是个睿智的年月，那是个蒙昧的年月；那是信心百倍的时期，那是疑虑重重的时期；那是阳光普照的季节，那是黑暗笼罩的季节；那是充满希望的春天，那是让人绝望的冬天；我们面前无所不有，我们面前一无所有；我们大家都在直升天堂，我们大家都在直下地狱——”重新再读文章第一段，感觉是如此的不同！相信其中的不同，也正是那十几个小时的收获，尽管表达的仍很浅显！
《双城记》读后感4
A Tale of Two Cities is one of Dickens’s masterpieces; the story is an exposure of the contradiction before France Revolution-the appealing of “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” by France lower class.
The main clue of the novel is based on the terrible experience of Dr. Manette, the plot is very complex, attracting, and exciting. Lying at the heart of which we can see the themes from different people.
Sydney Carton
When I read the chapter pertaining to interrogation on Charles Darney, intuition tells that the lawyer assistant who feels at ease with his eyes fixed on the ceiling must be a very special man, which turned out to be right when I finished the whole book. He seems indifferent about everything, even his love. He is brilliant but he thinks otherwise, or rather, he thinks he is inferior to others. Even his master thinks that if he worried about this or that, he would make a great success. Feeling of humbleness is the fatal point leading the loss of his beloved one. If Lucie Manette lives with him, he thinks, she would sustain much hardship. At the end of the story, he sacrifices his life for his love willingly.
Many people say that love is selfish and egocentric, but the temperament of Sydney Carton tells us that love can be sublime and pure. Through this, Dickens tells us loving someone doesn’t mean you should live together with him or her. You can help your beloved one silently, even sacrifice for love. This is universal fraternity, I think, which is the sublimation of normal love. And also, Dickens may indicate that true love really exists, regardless of the situation is full of commotion or not.
Charles Darney
He’s born at a family of royal lineage-the son of Marquis. Regret and abomination fill in his mind for the cruelty and the crime his family have done to the poor. He determines to quit the right of inheritance of his family and moves to England to acting as a French teacher. When he comes back to France, his notorious and sadistic uncle who holds the succession of the family doesn’t welcome him. His uncle is doomed to death because of his cruelty. When he returns to England, he proposes marriage to Lucie Manette. He knows his proposal may not be accepted by Dr.Manette, for he is the son of the enemy of Dr.Manette. After the France Revolution breaks out, he returns to France again to save a servant. But unfortunately, he’s cast into prison.
Lucie Manette
She goes to France with Jarvis Lorry to take her father back, she shows great sympathy to Sydney Carton, and she prayed his husband would get an early deliverance from captivity.
She is a kind-hearted lady made of love and sympathy; she is also the incarnation of elegance.
Dr.Manette
As a victim of the gloom society, he lives a miserable and contradictory life. After releasing from prison, the only thing he does is making shoes, which become worse when he comes across a harsh situation. He loves his daughter just as she does to him, even when he knows that Charles Darney is the son of his enemy, he allow the proposal. And when he notices his daughter was totally down to know the fact that her husband was put into prison, he promise to her that he will rescue him out. He spares no effects to do that, in vain, though.
From this person, Dickens may tells that love between the lower-class family members are as pure as crystal.
Jarvis Lorry
An elderly manager at Tellson's Bank and a dear friend of Dr. Manette. He is very loyal to Dr. Manette. He accompanies them all the time without considering his own life.
Couple Defarge
They’re the leader of the revolution. Ernest Defarge, to some extent, is a good man. He was the servant of Dr.Manette, he provides accommodation for him. But his wife, Madame Defarge, is really a wicked woman. She knits all the time, she wants to kill all the people who lead a richer or happier life just out of envying and revenge. The result turns out to be dramatic: she’s killed by herself as a consequence that the gun goes off by accident.
Resurrection maybe is the main theme in the novel. Dickens here implied that he doesn’t agree the upper class treat the poor badly, meanwhile, he doesn’t agree the lower-class to overthrow the upper class. He hopes that they can live in harmony with each other. Underneath the lines, Dickens wants his readers to be careful that the same sort of revolution that so damaged France won't happen in Britain, which is shown to be nearly as unjust as France. But his warning is addressed not to the British lower classes, but to the aristocracy. He repeatedly uses the metaphor of sowing and reaping; if the aristocracy continues to plant the seeds of a revolution through behaving unjustly, they can be certain of harvesting that revolution in time. The lower classes do not have any agency in this metaphor: they simply react to the behavior of the aristocracy. In this sense it can be said that while Dickens sympathizes with the poor, he identifies with the rich: they are the book's audience, its "us" rather than its "them". Crush humanity out of shape once more, under similar hammers, and it will twist itself into the same tortured forms. Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again and it will surely yield the same fruit according to its kind.
《双城记》读后感5
The tale of two cities is a historical story, one of Dickens’ long fictions.The background to the novel is the revolution of France 。It portrayed a brutal and bloody story，but it also contained love and friendship.
In the novel, Dickens sarcastically described a typical cruel nobleman-marquis of Evermonde 。 When he was young he and his brother stole a countrywoman by force and killed her family 。What’s worse，he used his power to imprison Dr Manette，a kind and honest man who knew all the things they had done and wanted to disclose their crimes 。 In order to hide their crimes. Marquis of Evermonde and his brother threw Doctor Manette into prison for 18 years 。 During these 18 years,Doctor Manette lost his freedom and suffer a great in spirit 。
I felt unthinkable that Marquis of Evermonde and his brother killed people just as easily as they killed chickens. They deprived other people’s freedom as they liked and they thought it was normal and unremarkable. They had never realized that they had done something wrong or something improper. Because their nature was cruel and evil, like demons. There is an old saying which means: People who mit too many crimes will kill themselves. After all, there is justice in the world. The demons can’t be rampant forever. Because the world will not forgive them. They will pay their lives for their crimes. Let’s see the consequence of the Marquis,He lay there like a stone with a knife pushed into his heart.” I think it was just what he ought to gain and it is a real exciting scene.
The Marquis’ death was just the beginning of people’s resistance to the nobleman. Gradually more and more people joined in the revolution. One after another nobleman were sentenced to death and their heads were cut down 。 However, some innocent people were implicated in the revolution. Charles Darney was one of them He was the nephew of Marquis of Evermonde. To the opposite of his uncle, Darney was a kind and independent young man.
Dickens spoke highly of kindness mercy and love in the novel too. This is the other thone of the novel when Doctor Manette was released from prison. It was his daughter Lucie who took care of him and helped him return to normal. During this time, Dr manette and Lucie knew Charles Darney and Sydeny Carton, the two young man fell in love with Lucie at the same time 。 At last, Lucie married Chares Darney 。Dr Manette accepted Darney as his son-in-law although he knew that Darney was the nephew of the man who threw him into prison for18 years. This is the love between father and daughter. And Sydeny Carton，the very great man，loved Lucie deeply. He promised Lucie that he would do everything for her happiness. He did it truely，he sacrificed himself instead of Darney who looked the same as him. This is love for lovers 。 This is the most wonderful thing in the world. It also reminds us that no matter how no matter when there is true love existing. At the end，Lucie, Dr Manette and Darney arrived in England safely.
The tale of two cities is different from other historical fictions. Its characters and main plots are fictional under the real background of the revolution of France. The author made the experience of the fictional charactor Dr Manette as the main clue.The plots are plicated, and they are flexuous and dramatic. The structure is plete and rigorous.
Dickens had dear love and hate. He praised those who ought to be praised and attacked those who ought to be attacked. The motivation of the novel maybe just warn the English dominators. But I think we can learn something meaningful from the tale of two cities.
《双城记》读后感6
A Love and Hate in A Tale of Two Cities Many have grown fond of the taleinvolving the noble， former Fr ench aristocrat， who had virtually unmatched(except maybe in boo ks) good fortune。 First， his life was saved by the pitifultestimony of a beautiful young woman。 Anyone would gladly have married th isbeautiful too-good-to-be-true-woman he wedded。 It is later seen， however， thatthis man should have married her even if she were u gly as sin。 This was not thecase though， and he married a beautif ul woman， who had an admirer who was adead ringer for her hus band， was a loser， and would give his life to keep herfrom pain， all of which really es in handy when her hubby is on his way to theguillotine。 This is not the story of a man with multiple gua rdian angels， butrather that of a character in Charles Dickens' nove l A Tale of Two Cities。 Askeptic could easily see this as an unbe lievable， idealistic and overratednovel that is too far-fetched。 An u nbiased reader， however， can see
that this is a story of love and ha te， each making up the bare-bones ofthe novel so that one must l ook closely to see Dickens' biases， attempts atpersuasion， and unbe lievable plot-lines， some of which are spawned fromDickens' love and hate， and some of which love and hate are used to develop。
The more lifeless of the characters we are supposed to like--the Ma nettes，Darnay， Lorry-- play their parts in the idyllic fashion Dicken s and like-mindedreaders want， a fashion made inflexible by circu mstances and purposes。"Circumstances and purposes" refers in larg e part to Dickens' state of mind andobjective。 Dickens' intrusive， u nusually editorial point of view， withreferences to "I" and deviatio ns from narration for monologue， reveals thenovel's slavery to the teachings of his morals--or perhaps his own slavery tothe morals o f his time and Protestantism。 Therefore， can Lucie be any differentfrom the supportive， wholly feminine wife and mother she is? Not if Dickens' isto stick to his obligation， or perhaps obstinate purpos e， of moral teachings。With that aside， what is to be said of Dickens' teaching， his presen tation oflove and hate? They both have one thing in mon: the characters representing eachare unmistakable at a mile away。 The moment Lucie Manette is put before
the reader's eyes， her tumblin g blond locks， her bright blue eyes， herseventeen-year-old， slight， p retty (but not sexy!) figure and all， he knowsthat， not only will sh e not be a villainous， unlikable character， but she willbe the epito me of the good， beautiful woman (and later housewife)， the one Dickens thought every women should be。 At this young woman's intr oduction withMr。 Lorry， she curtseys to him， and Dickens wastes
no time in pointing out that "young ladies made curtseys in those days"。The introductory scene climaxes at fair Lucie's fainting， one that， to some，puts her unflawed position into question， although to Dickens， it reinforces it。At the other side of this moral lecture are the Defarges。 Call Dicke ns a masterfor embodying qualities， but here are another flawless pair--flawlessly evil，and sentenced to evil from the moment we see Madame Defarge's "watchful eye thatseldom seemed to look at a nything， a large hand heavily ringed， a steady face，strong features， and great posure of manner"， a stark contrast to the slight，fai nting figure of Mada-- or rather， Miss Manette。 To further turn us againstgood old Madame Defarge， Dickens has her using a toothpi ck publicly in heropening scene， an activity dainty Miss Manette wouldn't dream of。 Finally， wemustn't forget the setting。 Lucie ma y have been born in France， but shedefected to England， and trave led from London to meet Mr。 Lorr
y。 Madame Defarge was a Frenc hwoman， born and living amongst peasants whodrank wine scoope d off of mud。 She probably was not taught Dickens' (and hisprima ry English audience's) Protestant morals in her Catholic nation， andcertainly did not manifest them。
In arguably the book's first touching scene (some say it's the one whereCarton is on his way to the guillotine)， Lucie goes through much trouble to coaxher father from his insanity， laying her head on his shoulder， and trusting aman she had never met。 When Mad ame Defarge sought vengeance for the cruelinjustice mitted ag ainst her kin， she looked to destroy not only the innocentdescende nt of the culprit， but his family-- an old man， a young woman， an d alittle girl。 These two characters' love and hate are unconditional and total。Did this have to be so? Could not Madame Defarge ha ve showed one bit offemininity， of human kindness? Could Lucie not have stolen a contemptuous glanceat her persecutors? Not with Dickens at the helm。 Lucie and Defarge are createdwith a convic tion， and once Dickens' plot was laid， the blinders he put on hisc haracters allowed only one route。 Perhaps it was a primitive style， but moderncharacters are painted more realistically， with human w eaknesses and
more variability。 Did it have to be so? Could Dicken s have captured morereaders， especially in the long run， if he had pursued more varying actions inhis characters， as well as more h umanness and believability? Does this point toDickens as a flawed writer， with little imagination and ability? Another factorthat must be considered is our inability to criticize a n English--orEnglish-living--character， or to find a modicum of res
pectability in a French one， with two exceptions。 One is the young womanwho is beheaded just before Sydney Carton。 She is the en emy of an enemy， she isgoing to be killed， and she allows Dicke ns to teach another moral using SydneyCarton。 Why not have her happy to die for the benefit of her countrymen， whilenot trembling as she ascends to her death， thereby depriving the mon enemy of asmall victory? With the modern trend of political correctness and anti-racism， aTale of Two Cities written today would never le ave the word processor。 JerryCruncher is about the most sinful of the English (aside from a spy but，remember， he defected to Franc e)， and he repents by the end， which counts foranother moral fro m Dickens。 In Dickens' time， racism was not regarded as it istoda y， and so if he wanted to use the French Revolution to send a me ssage tothe population， it was his right， but he may have taken thi s too far for some。Today， Lucie Manette would by no means be taken seriously as
a believable， even likable character。 She persists in fainting at particularly stressful moments， but when her husband is before a heartless， bloodthirstyjury， she looks brave and strong just for him。 In cont ext， this was a screamingcontradiction， but one that Dickens requir ed to portray his Eve。 It is mucheasier to believe Madame Defarg e's hate than her opposition's love。 Defarge'ssister was raped and
murdered mercilessly and her brother was killed by a pair heartless"noblemen"。 It is much easier to understand Defarge's taste for blo od than thecondition of Manette， who， after practicing as a pet ent doctor and actingnormally for years， experiences a recurrence of his mental condition simplybecause his wonderful daughter has left for two weeks， although he has two dearfriends nearby。 Charles Dickens has built an enduring story enjoyed by millions，w hich is loved by experts and critics today although it would be im mediatelybutchered if written by a modern author。 It is a love stor y loved by itscreator， but wholly unbelievable。 It is actually doom ed by its own idealism andunrealistic characters。 As a hate story， i t is much more petent， although alsousing this for its own pur poses。 One can draw one's own conclusions and ideasfrom such a book， but facts are facts。
《双城记》读后感7
《双城记》是英国作家查尔斯·狄更斯所著的一部以法国大革命为背景所写成的长篇历史小说，情节感人肺腑，是世界文学经典名著之一，故事中将巴黎、伦敦两个大城市连结起来，围绕着曼马内特医生一家和以德法日夫妇为首的圣安东尼区展开故事。小说里描写了贵族如何败坏、如何残害百姓，人民心中积压对贵族的刻骨仇恨，导致了不可避免的法国大革命，本书的主要思想是为了爱而自我牺牲。书名中的“双城”指的是巴黎与伦敦。
故事中将巴黎、伦敦两个大城市连结起来，围绕着曼马内特医生一家和以德发日夫妇为首的圣安东尼区展开故事。小说里描写了贵族如何败坏、如何残害百姓，人民心中积压对贵族的'刻骨仇恨，导致了不可避免的法国大革命。书名中的“双城”指的是巴黎与伦敦。
该小说创作于19世纪50年代，正处于英国资本主义经济快速发展时期，资本主义发展带来的种种罪恶和劳动人民生活的贫困化，导致下层群众中存在极端的愤懑与不满，英国社会处于爆发一场社会大革命的边缘，这与18世纪末法国的社会现状极为相似，狄更斯通过对两个城市的对比，给当时的英国社会以借鉴及警醒。
《双城记》读后感8
本部小说文笔十分风趣，作者始终在应用辩证关联跟重复的伎俩来实现这种后果，所以这部感人的小说还能读起来令人非常想笑。
文章有特色的一处是最后作者“辅助卡顿发表感触“。作者用卡顿的语言交待了文章的.终局，告知人们”仁慈在世界永存“的情理。
这就是我读过这部小说的感想。
《双城记》读后感9
"这是最好的时候，也是最糟糕的时候。"《双城记》的第一句话被引用了无数次。但是我想知道这句话的人不一定知道电影《双城记》讲的是什么样的故事，也不知道他们为什么说这句话。
如果你想理解这句话的原意，以及为什么说要写这句著名的经典句子，你必须自然地阅读原文。
—简而言之，那个时代和今天非常相似。这句话实际上解释了上述经典句子的两个问题：为什么和对谁？
这是这部电影诞生的原因之一。狄更斯想通过描述法国大革命带来的灾难来表达他的担忧，同时警告英国的危险处境。一段革命历史，两座分别代表两个国家的城市，以及一些动荡的人民，构成了这一纲领的主要内容。
虽然《双城记》是一部经典电影，但它在革命中的表现被认为是作者的历史观，因为它明确指出革命的背景是法国大革命。这是这部电影众多争议的焦点。狄更斯不仅用他的笔墨表现了贵族的残酷，而且还表现了革命群众的非理性毁灭。
他认为，革命是一种取代另一种压迫的.压迫，是一场直接而激烈的血腥暴力运动，是一场取代另一种血腥暴力的运动。对攻占巴士底狱和对公众施暴的一系列描述血腥、残忍、狡猾和恶毒是这部电影最显著的特点。
狄更斯用大量的笔墨来描述暴民的权利和权利，表现出他对暴民的仇恨，这在一定程度上可以说是他对革命的仇恨。当然，作为一个人文主义者，狄更斯也指出了拯救世界的良药：爱。
这种爱体现在电影中，包括个人感情、爱情和友谊，以及抛弃贵族、拯救平民的友谊。其中，最精彩的是对卡顿爱情的描述。
我非常喜欢卡顿。事实上，卡顿是狄更斯的化身。狄更斯首先想到卡尔顿和他的一些精神，然后构思了这部电影。
卡顿是什么样的人？电影中描述道：“太阳是悲伤和悲伤的，而极度悲伤和悲伤的冉冉站了起来。
它看到的风景不比这个人差。他很有天赋，很有感情，但他没有机会展示他的才华和感情。他不能做任何事，也不能寻求自己的幸福。
他知道问题的症结所在，但把它留给了一个偶然的机会，一年又一年地浪费时间，几乎所有的时间
这是一个因自我放纵而失去才华和青春的年轻人。他为什么愿意沉溺于自我放纵？这部电影似乎没有任何解释，自从他出现以来一直如此，也没有多少关于他家庭背景的描述。
被自己抛弃的悲观主义者卡顿，当他的朋友遇到困难，他心爱的女人的丈夫即将被送上断头台时，突然出现了。当他获救时，他以自己的生命为代价救了他心爱的女人的丈夫。
这难道不是救了自己而死的姬度的爱吗？事实上，电影中的卡顿死前确实用圣经的口吻说过，“复活在我里面，生命在我里面，相信我的人，尽管已经死了，也会复活。无论谁活着并相信我，都不会死。
这是狄更斯为“最糟糕的时期”准备的药，但它毕竟是一种理想。有人说，如果没有西德尼卡顿的存在和行动，《双城记》作为一部不朽的作品，将会失去它的价值和辉煌。我完全同意。
《双城记》读后感10
这个假期，我利用空余时间阅读了狄更斯的《双城记》，也有了些体悟，下面我来把我的感受写下来。
一、情节布置
这部著作的情节是十分玄妙的，作者把各种线索串联起来，如文中所说的一样“编织”成了这部小说。小说最大的特点是人物关系复杂：如马 奈特医生和达南的关系；德发奇太太与达南的关系——这两个关系直接导致了最后的悲剧。还有洛瑞先生与德发奇的关系以及格仑舍与密探的关系等等。这些复杂的人物关系使此部著作情节环环相扣。
这本书最有特色的一个章节是顿临死前与一位小姑娘的对话，从这番对话中彻底揭示了革命群众过于疯狂以及善将永存的主旨。
二、人物特点
本书最重要的人物是查尔斯·达南（埃弗蒙德）。他是一个很矛盾的人，他非常憎恨自己的父亲与叔父，但是他还必须支撑整个家族的产业。所以，当老仆人给他写信 时，他便不得不回到法国。他是一个善良的人，具备一位贵族所具有的文明气质，并且当他去会见自己的叔父时，他明确提出了“不能再迫害人民”的说法。同时，他放弃了贵族特权，本来就是一件善事。
悉尼·卡顿也是位重要人物。在读这部小说的.前半部分时，我一直不大喜欢这个随意、懒惰的人物。但是在往后读的过程中，我发现他是一个敢作敢为、足智多谋的人。虽然是“朋友”，但实际上卡顿和达南的关系并没有那么好，但是为了他们一家人幸福滴生活，卡顿甘愿走上断头台，让达南逃跑，而自己成了永恒的善的化身。在文章中提到卡顿死时“犹如一位先知“。
德发奇夫妇也属于本书中的焦点人物。德发奇本人是个善良的人，他收留了马奈特医生，并且在大革命之后告诉自己的夫人见好就收。而德发奇太太就是个复仇者，她受过埃弗蒙德兄弟的迫害，所以她一心想杀掉法国所有贵族。当然，由于她的过激行为，使她最后死于普洛士小姐手中。
三。写作特色
本部小说文笔非常幽默，作者一直在使用辩证关系和反复的手法来实现这种效果，所以这部感人的小说还能读起来令人十分想笑。
文章有特色的一处是最后作者“帮助卡顿发表感想“。作者用卡顿的语言交待了文章的结局，告诉人们”善良在世界永存“的道理。
这就是我读过这部小说的感受。
《双城记》读后感11
我看《双城记》，原因是在网上有许多网友推荐，他们都说那是一本非常感人的书，我怀着好奇心就在网上下载来看，看完了一部分感觉还不错，就写下这篇读后感。
《双城记》主要是深刻描绘了当时动荡不安的时代背景，和历史现实而牺牲的儿女情长。
网上有人说，《双城记》只是描写了两个男人跟一个女人的故事，但我却觉得，那个人没有了解作者真正想表达的意思。以我看来，德发奇一家与法国贵族的仇恨也好，露西、查尔斯与西德尼的感情也好，都只是为了表现这场战争是谁引起的，为什么事而起的。其实人与人之间都必须保持着宽以待人的态度，即使是天大的事也能大事化小，小事化了。记得发生在我身上的`一件事：有一次，我不小心把同学的书弄丢了，原本我还以为她会要我赔，还要怪我呢。没想到当我和她讲的时候，她不仅没骂我，还对我讲说以后不能丢三落四了，应该养成好习惯。恩，也许这就是人与人之间的态度吧！
在这部作品里，我看到了很多不同的人。有正直善良却又惨遭迫害的马奈特医生，忠厚老实的洛瑞，外表冷漠、内心热情，放荡而又无私的西德尼，没有人性的德发奇太太，凶残阴险的埃佛瑞蒙兄弟……里面有复杂的仇恨，想复仇却又制造了更多的仇恨，这复杂的一幕幕，生动的展现在我们面前，我们仿佛又回到了那个失去理智的时代。有人抱怨自己生在这个世纪是件坏事，要生在从前，最起码能当个烈士。其实这种想法是错误的，我们生在现代就应该为现代做贡献。而人世间有各种各样的人，他们都有不同的个性，我们不要因为谁的性格怪异而不与他交友，也不要太相信身边的人，也许他就是想害你的其中一个。
文中《双城记》，最让我喜欢的是律师助手西德尼·卡尔顿。他第一次出现就与众不同，当法庭上的人若无其事地望着天花板时，而他的一张字条却揭晓了案件背后的阴谋。他一出场就带着一身的忧郁，作为律师的他算得上是才华出众，但是却又情愿躲在人家的后面，做别人成功的垫脚石，他仿佛自己亲手筑起了一堵墙，与名利隔绝。他曾说过：“我是个绝望了的苦力，我不关心世上任何人，也没有任何人关心我。”
是啊，我们不应该渴望出名，那样就学不到更多的知识。也许做别人背后的垫脚石，还能操你个别人那里学到更多的知识，我们能够看到他的长处和短处，学习他的长处，抛掉自己的短处。
《双城记》读后感12
The book of Shuangcheng is one of the most important works of Dickens. Long before the creation of the book of Shuangcheng, Dickens paid close attention to the French Revolution and studied the history of French Revolution by Carlile, a British historian, and other scholars. His keen interest in the French Revolution began with concerns about the serious social crisis lurking in Britain at the time. By the end of 1854, he said: "I believe that discontent smoke than fire like this up to much worse, particularly as the first revolution in France before the outbreak of the public psychology, which is dangerous, because the imperious and incompetence of hundreds of reasons - such as bad harvest, the nobility of the already tense situation the last step up, the loss of war overseas and domestic incidents -- that have never seen turned into a terrible fire." Therefore, "Shuangcheng" this historical novel creation motive is Jiegufengjin, to experience the history of the French Revolution for reference, and sounded the alarm to the British ruling class; at the same time, through the revolution about the extreme terror, also harbor resentment, hope to violence against the tyranny of the masses warned, find a way to fantasy social contradictions growing status of the uk.
For this purpose, the novel profoundly exposed before the French Revolution intensified the deep social contradictions, strongly criticized the nobility Huangyan brutal, and deeply sympathize with the suffering of the people of lower. The work pointed out sharply that there was a limit to the tolerance of the masses. Under the cruel rule of the aristocracy, the masses were forced to revolt against the necessity of subsistence. This resistance is just. The novel also depicts the spectacular scenes of the uprising, the people attacking the Bastille and the great strength of the people. However, the author stands on the humanitarian side of the bourgeoisie, that is, against the tyranny of cruel oppression of the people, and against the violence of the revolutionary people against tyranny. In Dickens's writing, the whole revolution was described as a great catastrophe that destroyed all things. It mercilessly punished the evil aristocracy, and killed innocent people blindly.
This novel shapes three kinds of characters. One is the Marquis efulimeng brothers as the representative of the feudal aristocracy, they "only unshakable philosophy is oppression", is the author of pain and lashing the object. The other is getting the cutting stone couple and so on revolutionary masses. It must be pointed out that their image is distorted. For example, Defarge's wife Diana, she was born in the humiliation, persecuted farmer, with a hatred of the feudal aristocracy, the author deeply sympathize with her plight, the revolution broke out after the admiration of her strong personality, outstanding talent and extraordinary leadership skills; but when the revolution further, Bi a turn her denigration as a cold, cruel, narrow avenger. Especially when she went to the doctor's house to search for Lucie and little Lucie, she was shown to be a bloodthirsty maniac. Finally, the author made her die at gunpoint and clearly expressed a negative attitude. The third category is the ideal figure in the eyes of the author humanitarian resolve social contradictions, to the example of love to overcome hatred, including Mernit and his daughter Dyer, and laurel and Kardon. Meinite doctor Marquis brothers depriving the breakup of the Marquis brothers have hatred, but to his daughter's love, Dyer feuding can abandon old hatreds; that the Marquis brothers and nephews, he condemned his family greatly discerning and apprehending, evil, abandon the title and property, determined by his actions to "sin". The people who reflect each other are the victims of aristocratic tyranny, tolerant and tolerant; one is the heir of the noble Marquis, and the other is benevolent. Among them was Lucie, who was the daughter and wife. In the bond of love they form a happy family of mutual understanding and affection. This is obviously the author envisaged a violent revolution contrary to the solution of social contradictions, is unrealistic.
The book of Shuangcheng is different from the general historical novel, and its characters and main plot are imaginary. In the broad real background of the French Revolution, the author of the fictional characters meinite experienced doctors mainly leads to miscarriage of justice, love and revenge three mutually independent and interrelated stories intertwined, intricate plot, complex clue. The author adopts flashback, narration interspersed with flashbacks, foreshadowing, techniques such as pave the way to novel structural integrity of tight, tense plot twists and turns and dramatic, showing excellent artistic skills. "Shuangcheng" style of solemn, gloomy, full of anger, but the lack of early works of humor.
《双城记》读后感13
而最后一类则是理想化的人物，在同是虚构的所有人物中，他们形成了鲜明的对比，几乎集合了所有的真、善、美，他们是作者心目中以人道主决社会矛盾、以博爱战胜仇恨的榜样，这些人包括梅尼特父女、代尔纳、罗瑞和卡尔顿等等。这些人也不是与黑暗的社会毫无关系，反而有着更为悲惨的身世，梅尼特医生从一开始就被侯爵兄弟害得家破人亡，还不清不白的进入了巴士底狱，他对侯爵兄弟的深仇大恨应该是不共戴天的，但是他没有被黑暗的仇恨所冲昏了头脑，他为了女儿的爱，毅然的摒弃了宿仇旧恨，宽怀的接纳了侯爵之子——代尔纳，而对于代尔纳自己，他虽然是侯爵兄弟的子侄，但他并不与黑暗的贵族们同流合污，反而毅然大义灭亲，谴责自己家族的罪恶，好不犹豫的抛弃了爵位和财产，并且决心以自己的行动来“赎罪”，彻底脱离这个黑暗而又肮脏的贵族群体，这对完全不同环境下的人物，形成鲜明的反差和对比，一位是贵族黑暗统治下的受害者，但却能因为女儿的幸福宽容为怀；一位是贵族侯爵的`继承人，却因内心的善良的本性断绝自己与黑暗的联系，主张仁爱。他们可以保持这种纯洁的变化，也可以作为露西的女儿和妻子。
正是因为露西，他们有一种无形的爱的纽带，在这种纽带下，他们形成了一个相互理解、感情和谐的幸福家庭，在世俗惊喜的目光下。这么一个真善美的境界，仿佛是在十八世纪中的一道曙光，充满着爱与希望，这显然是作者刻意刻画出来的场景，从理性思维和人道主义的立场中诞生的一条与暴力革命截然相反的解决社会矛盾的出路。
阅读整篇文章，我想大多数读者都能深刻理解作者的意图，即永恒的主题。爱是世界上最伟大的情感，它比恨强大的多。世界上的一切都是相对的，爱和恨也是相对的。这本书的开篇完美地解释了世界的相对存在：
“那是最美好的时代，那是最糟糕的时代；那是智慧的年头，那是愚昧的年头；那是信仰的时期，那是怀疑的时期；那是光明的季节，那是黑暗的季节；那是希望的春天，那是失望的冬天；我们全都在直奔天堂，我们全都在直奔相反的方向——简而言之，那时跟现在非常相象，某些最喧嚣的权威坚持要用形容词的最高级来形容它。说它好是最高的；说它坏是最高的。”
所有的事都没有其固定的性质，无所谓好，也无所谓坏，只与人的心境有关，一切由心而生，由心而终，而其中的一切，将是由我们自己去把握了。
《双城记》读后感14
The tale of two cities is a historical story, one of Dickens’ long background to the novel is the revolution of France portrayed a brutal and bloody story , but it also contained love and friendship.
In the novel, Dickens sarcastically described a typical cruel nobleman—marquis of Evermonde . When he was young he and his brother stole a countrywoman by force and killed her family ’s worse , he used his power to imprison Dr Manette , a kind and honest man who knew all the things they had done and wanted to disclose their crimes . In order to hide their crimes. Marquis of Evermonde and his brother threw Doctor Manette into prison for 18 years . During these 18 years,Doctor Manette lost his freedom and suffer a great in spirit .
I felt unthinkable that Marquis of Evermonde and his brother killed people just as easily as they killed chickens. They deprived other people’s freedom as they liked and they thought it was normal and unremarkable. They had never realized that they had done something wrong or something improper. Because their nature was cruel and evil, like demons. There is an old saying which means: People who commit too many crimes will kill themselves. After all, there is justice in the world. The demons can’t be rampant forever. Because the world will not forgive them. They will pay their lives for their crimes. Let’s see the consequence of the Marquis,’’He lay there like a stone with a knife pushed into his heart.” I think it was just what he ought to gain and it is a real exciting scene.
The Marquis’ death was just the beginning of people’s resistance to the nobleman. Gradually more and more people joined in the revolution. One after another nobleman were sentenced to death and their heads were cut down . However, some innocent people were implicated in the revolution. Charles Darney was one of them He was the nephew of Marquis of Evermonde. To the opposite of his uncle, Darney was a kind and independent young man.
Dickens spoke highly of kindnemercy and love in the novel too. This is the other thone of the novel when Doctor Manette was released from prison. It was his daughter Lucie who took care of him and helped him return to normal. During this time, Dr manette and Lucie knew Charles Darney and Sydeny Carton, the two young man fell in love with Lucie at the same time . At last, Lucie married Chares Darney Manette accepted Darney as his son-in-law although he knew that Darney was the nephew of the man who threw him into prison for18 years. This is the love between father and daughter. And Sydeny Carton , the very great man ,loved Lucie deeply. He promised Lucie that he would do everything for her happiness. He did it truely ,he sacrificed himself instead of Darney who looked the same as him. This is love for lovers . This is the most wonderful thing in the world. It also reminds us that no matter how no matter when there is true love existing. At the end , Lucie, Dr Manette and Darney arrived in England safely.
The tale of two cities is different from other historical fictions. Its characters and main plots are fictional under the real background of the revolution of France. The author made the experience of the fictional charactor Dr Manette as the main plots are complicated, and they are flexuous and dramatic. The structure is complete and rigorous.
Dickens had dear love and hate. He praised those who ought to be praised and attacked those who ought to be attacked. The motivation of the novel maybe just warn the English dominators. But I think we can learn something meaningful from the tale of two cities.
《双城记》读后感15
端午假期说长不长，说短又不短，三天时间，远程旅行没办法，短途旅行又不甘心，思来想去，只有待在家里多陪家人。趁此时间，读了两本书，《双城记》与《断舍离》。
断舍离现在已经算是网红词了，放下执念，放下欲望，人才会活得轻松。不过我的感悟最多的倒不是放下，而是另外两点：
1、人生得意时，要多往上看，这样自己才会更有动力；人生失意时，要多往下看，这样自己才会知足常乐；
2、人生向上时，要告诉自己，人活一世，不能浑浑噩噩过；人生向下时，要劝自己，人生苦短，要看开，不要太累。
更多的感想是看双城记后引发的。双城记是狄更斯的作品，与雾都孤儿一样都是世界名著，不过读完之后感觉就算同为世界名著，也分为上中下等，双城记应该是其中相对低层次的。
双城记的故事设置相对巧妙，也用了一些技法，通过一个很强的悬念引出故事，“死人复活了”，不可谓不巧妙，再加上那个经典名段，“这是最好的时代，又是最坏的时代”，足以吸引读者进行下去，接下来又通过两个不同家庭各自的故事线往前延伸，你虽然不知道他们之间有什么关系，但是你肯定知道他们之间一定会有什么关系。等到故事收尾的时候，你才发现，哇，前面的各种线索，各种不解，都是很好的铺垫，故事的转折还算巧妙，看完是可以回味回味的。
而且这类名著与小白文的最大的`区别，除了情节的细节一环扣一环，前后呼应的伏笔，人物对话的丰富性等，最大的不同在于，双城记是通过小人物的人生遭遇，给读者展现了法国大革命的全貌，阶级的冲突，人物命运的前后颠倒，对下等阶层人物的同情，却又保证客观性，并不一味站在哪一边，等到革命成功之后，起义群众对于生命的蔑视，对于正义的罔顾，对于对错的愚昧，也成了作者讽刺的对象，最终的结果必然是悲剧，因为只有悲剧的内核才足够引起反思与警醒。
这跟金庸的不少小说有异曲同工之妙，将故事嵌入进时代的大背景中，浑然天成，并不会感觉是故事，这非得对于历史与世情的理解到十分，才可以实现。不同的是金庸写的是通俗小说，其中取悦读者的部分，比如主角的爱情，各种武侠招式的奇妙，最终大团圆大结局的设计，对整个故事的立意与内涵是有一些遗憾的。
但是双城记也并不是没有遗憾，其中主角露西与达奈二人的形象过于脸谱化，一对优秀的青年男女，简直是没有缺点的存在，德法耶太太的邪恶部分完全盖过了她的坚定，机智等特质，对她的悲惨命运也没有多加阐述，整个弱化了故事的矛盾与冲突感，不得不说是一种遗憾。而且各种人物配角的血肉不够丰满立体，特别是主角西德尼的描述上，如果能够多花费一些篇幅，多描写他的经历与人生，引起读者的认同与代入感，那最终的结局带来的震撼与惋惜一定会更强烈。
【《双城记》读后感】相关文章：
《双城记》读后感04-30
双城记读后感03-08
双城记读后感01-23
《双城记》读后感08-30
双城记读后感15篇03-25
史记读后感 读后感《史记》11-17
《我的小学》读后感 -读后感05-15
背影读后感:《背影》读后感03-30
史记的读后感最新 读后感03-05